Counter-expertise and second opinion
In short
When a blockchain report carries weight in a dispute, an independent check of its reasoning shows whether the conclusion actually holds.
- Paucitas independently reviews an existing blockchain report or analysis.
- We assess whether the data supports the conclusion and where the reasoning has gaps.
- A counter-expertise or second opinion gives you a substantiated basis to accept, question or rebut a report.
- We work neutrally; we check the reasoning, not the desired outcome.
Do you doubt the conclusion of a blockchain report? Paucitas provides counter-expertise and a second opinion: an independent check of whether the underlying data actually supports the conclusion that has been drawn.
When is a second opinion useful?
Blockchain reports can carry significant weight in a dispute, a procedure or a bank’s assessment. If a conclusion has major consequences for you, it is reasonable to have its evidential value tested. A counter-expertise or second opinion establishes whether the reasoning is sound and complete.
How Paucitas reviews a report
We examine the source data, the method used and the steps from data to conclusion. We check whether the chain reconstruction is complete, whether alternative explanations were considered, and whether the conclusion follows from the evidence. The review is carried out by an independent expert who has no stake in the outcome.
What you receive
You receive a substantiated assessment of the original report: where it is sound, where it overreaches, and where the data does not support the stated conclusion. This gives you and your advisers a factual basis to accept, question or rebut the report.
Our approach step by step
We start by reviewing the existing report and its underlying data. We then test the method and reasoning, document where the conclusion is or is not supported, and record our assessment in a verifiable report of our own.
Related terms and background
Further reading
Related topics
Frequently asked questions about counter-expertise and second opinion
Do you only confirm or reject the original report?
Neither by default. We assess where the report is sound and where it is not, and we say so on the basis of the data. The aim is an honest check of the reasoning, not a predetermined outcome.
Can a second opinion be used in proceedings?
Yes. Our assessment is recorded factually and verifiably, so it can be brought into a procedure alongside the original report.